Showing posts with label branz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label branz. Show all posts

Friday, July 13, 2007

A rusty Sola60 just one year old

These two photos are of a Sola60 panel that is just one year old. The elderly couple spent precious savings with the intention of making a meagre pension for further.

No building consent.




This panel was inspected by a Branz researcher who said nothing of this corrosion, leaving this elderly couple with the impression that their system was in perfect condition.






  • Solahart and Sola60 feature prominently. This is only because I have not found many other brands. My findings are not necessarily representative of the industry.

Reports commissioned by EECA outline the problems

Here they are; hot off the press along with analysis and commentary:

Branz report about seven Wellington installations

Branz report about solar water heating systems

Reponse from Solahart

Response of Sola60

Reponse of Gary Moller

Response of Gary Moller to Solahart letter

NB: I have used the wrong terminology in places: Where I refer to a "Certificate of Compliance", this should read " Certificate of Acceptance" . As a matter of interest, applications for a Certificate of Acceptance are made as per Building Act 2004 Sections 96,97,98 & 99.

Post your comments
You are invited to post your comments by clicking on the "comments" tab at the foot of this or any other posting

Did Branz and EECA know there might be a performance problem early 2006?

You be the judge.....
"One of the biggest uncertainties in the cost/benefit analysis of solar water heating systems is the lack of reliable field data for system performances. Anecdotal evidence suggests that most existing systems fall significantly short of the calculated values used during the system design. This information gap needs to be urgently addressed by conducting a representative field study of existing solar water systems in New Zealand. "

The main conclusion from this study is that it is important to test actual systems before making any assumptions about energy savings and or economic performance. In particular it can be seen that the high cost of installed systems in NZ makes it difficult for them to achieve good economic return on capital. It is also clear that evacuated tube systems need to be taken into serious consideration as a preferred system type, especially for the cooler parts of the country.

"The performance of the flat-plate pumped circulation system has proved to be highly suspect and possibly dependant on the fact that it was a ‘retrofit’ installation to an existing domestic hot water cylinder. This is an important finding, as there are no on site performance tests for solar hot water systems undertaken and many New Zealand systems may be seriously underperforming, perhaps unbeknown to the house owner. "Go here for to read the full report.